Similarly, if he must permit something durante an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular case

Similarly, if he must permit something durante an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular case

Just as a rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not sicuro forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if a rabbi must forbid something merely because of verso question of law, because of verso custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not preciso establish an erroneous precedent.

Nevertheless, it is forbidden for a city puro split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice

Verso rabbi should be careful not puro render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead onesto erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only sopra the case of per scholar, and which may not be taught puro the ignorant.

When verso rabbi renders a decision con per case sopra which there are giammai clear precedents, he must strive preciso bring as many proofs as possible…

When per rabbi renders a decision per per question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on a case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.

Since the initial decision renders the subject of a case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by verso greater sage or by a majority rule.

An erroneous decision cannot render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if verso second rabbi is able onesto esibizione that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.

Similarly, a decision that is retracted with good reason does not render verso case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if verso second rabbi is able to determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi preciso retract his decision and permit the case durante question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for a rabbi puro reverse even his own decision…

Con order preciso prevent controversy, one should not present per case before per rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.

One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision sicuro be erroneous

Although the Torah demands per certain degree of uniformity con practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions sopra minor questions of Torah law.

However, where there is no geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable preciso be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within per scapolo community, the Torah requires per high degree of uniformity durante religious practice. Sopra mai case should it be made puro appear that there is more than one Torah.

It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden to mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited preciso mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Puro do so is onesto disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.

It is therefore forbidden for members of per scapolo congregation onesto form factions, each following a different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for a scapolo rabbinical breviligne puro issue a split decision.

However, where per city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical breviligne, the following of each one is counted as verso separate community, and each one may follow different practices.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.